Employee engagement has long been a buzz word. Now with study after study showing engagement has a direct impact on productivity, quality and retention, it’s fast becoming a key focus for many forward-thinking companies.
Whereas employee satisfaction has always been a valuable measure, employee engagement is the new paradigm. Consider that a ‘satisfied’ employee is not necessarily an ‘engaged’ employee, nor a highly productive employee. In today’s highly competitive workplace, it might be that the employee satisfaction model is ‘bankrupt.’ (ouch!)
Because employee engagement is so dynamic and fluctuates frequently it must be carefully, and frequently monitored. We all know that engagement is one or lost on day one and every day thereafter. The good news is that disengagement can be intercepted, and salvaged if it’s identified and addressed quickly.
In order to manage engagement, you have to ask the question, “how engaged are you?” And, you have to ask it often. Then, you have to take visible action to address engagement ‘busters’ quickly.
In a nationwide employee engagement challenge, where companies monitored engagement every month for six months using the Engagement Index, some very interesting trends emerged. First, we noticed engagement is volatile, and second, that when employees are asked to rate their level of engagement regularly, it generates a rich and important dialogue about what engagement is, why it’s important and what can be done about it.
Scott Mesh, PhD and CEO of Los Ninos, a New York based social service organization and Best Place to Work award winner, speaks candidly of the benefits of ‘keeping his finger on the pulse’ of employee engagement. He openly admits he was fascinated by the monthly shifts in engagement amongst his employees, and, in some cases, surprised and even shocked at the reasons they offered about what was affecting their level of energy at work.
When you ask employees, “how engaged are you?’ better be prepared for the truth, and better be prepared to do something about it. At Los Ninos, over the course of the six month Engagement Challenge, many valuable issues emerged. Some of them were long-term organizational issues, others just old ‘stuff’, and some were just simple requests to improve the work environment, like: “Change the @*!$% light bulbs.”
Changing the light bulbs would seem inconsequential in terms of it’s ability to improve employee engagement, wouldn’t it? Scott shared later that the few dollars he spent on new light bulbs was likely the best few dollars he had spent in a long time. Funny, how responding to the small (seemingly inconsequential) things, often most demonstrate that you care.
Engagement isn’t scientific, neither is it linear. Naturally, when examining employee engagement, there is a tendency for companies to get caught up in complex, long-term issues that require lots of resources and can take months or even years to resolve. Consider that the ‘low hanging fruit’ have the greatest value.
Where are there ‘low hanging fruit’ in your company that, if addressed, would communicate you heard employees and value them?
P.S. How’s the lighting?